Literature
Find the publication behind a result. Each entry says what the paper establishes, how this project uses it, and what it leaves unsettled.
View the publication timeline
The strip places every dated source on one year axis, 1932 to 2026, in a lane per tradition: Optimal experimental design, 1960 to 2019, 12 sources; Quantization for estimation, 2006 to 2026, 8 sources; Determinant clustering and exchange, 1967 to 1999, 5 sources; Vector quantization and Voronoi theory, 1958 to 2025, 29 sources; Inference-aware summaries in particle physics, 2019 to 2025, 3 sources; Score compression and ratio estimation, 2004 to 2019, 5 sources; Plug-in asymptotics, 1932 to 2007, 21 sources; Other sources, 1967 to 2021, 6 sources.
- Optimal experimental design
- Quantization for estimation
- Determinant clustering and exchange
- Vector quantization and Voronoi theory
- Fisher 1958
- Gersho 1979
- Pollard 1981
- Bucklew, Wise 1982
- Zador 1982
- Carstensen 1983
- Kieffer 1983
- Megiddo 1983
- Sabin, Gray 1986
- Flury 1990
- Serinko, Babu 1992
- Toledo 1993
- Tarpey, Li, Flury 1995
- Tarpey, Flury 1996
- Du, Faber, Gunzburger 1999
- Garcia, Escudero, Gordaliza 1999
- Graf, Luschgy 2000
- Gupta, Hero 2003
- Hennig 2004
- Mease, Nair 2006
- Rakhlin, Caponnetto 2006
- Telgarsky, Vattani 2010
- Wang, Song 2011
- Levrard 2015
- Richter, Alexa 2015
- Grønlund 2017
- Gajjar, Radhakrishnan 2019
- Liu, Pages 2020
- Blanchard, Jaffe, Zhivotovskiy 2025
- Inference-aware summaries in particle physics
- Score compression and ratio estimation
- Plug-in asymptotics
- Wishart 1932
- Cramér 1946
- Kendall, Stuart 1961
- Sugiura, Fujikoshi 1969
- Bhattacharya, Ghosh 1978
- Cramér, Nicewander 1979
- Donner, Koval 1980
- Muirhead, Waternaux 1980
- Serfling 1980
- Radhakrishnan, Kshirsagar 1981
- Fang, Krishnaiah 1982
- Hampel, Ronchetti, Rousseeuw, Stahel 1986
- Hall 1992
- Romanazzi 1992
- Seo, Kanda, Fujikoshi 1995
- van der Vaart 1998
- Magnus, Neudecker 1999
- Robin, Smith 2000
- Anderson 2003
- Taskinen, Croux, Kankainen, Ollila, Oja 2006
- Kelley 2007
Optimal experimental design
The Equivalence of Two Extremum Problems
establishes as the natural D sensitivity metric and provides the archetype for a global optimality certificate.
The Sequential Generation of D-Optimum Experimental Designs
Wynn · 1970
sequentially add points chosen by sensitivity; convergence and generalized-variance bounds.
Results in the Theory and Construction of D-Optimum Experimental Designs
Wynn · 1972
extends generation ideas to , selected parameter subsets, and discrete designs.
A Geometric Approach to Optimal Design Theory
Silvey, Titterington · 1973
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Some General Points in the Theory of Optimal Experimental Design
Whittle · 1973
general concave criterion/equivalence viewpoint; consequences for iterative construction and transformations including -related ideas.
General Equivalence Theory for Optimum Designs (Approximate Theory)
Kiefer · 1974
broad -optimal theory including D, L, E and other criteria.
Coefficients in D-Optimal Experimental Design
prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.
Optimal design measures with singular information matrices
Silvey · 1978
prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.
An Algorithm for Optimal Designs on a Design Space
Silvey, Titterington, Torsney · 1978
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
D_s-optimality and Whittle's equivalence theorem
equivalence including singular cases; simplified sufficient conditions.
General Differential and Lagrangian Theory for Optimal Experimental Design
Pukelsheim, Titterington · 1983
the comparison template for DS19's tilt certificate — a dual multiplier certifies optimality.
Information-Based Optimal Subdata Selection for Big Data Linear Regression
prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.
Context for this tradition
Fedorov (1972) — optimal experiments and exchange
- Use
exact/discrete design, exchange construction, rank-update thinking.
- Book
Theory of Optimal Experiments
Pukelsheim — modern reference
- Use
matrix criteria, efficiency, equivalence, geometric formulation.
- Book
Optimal Design of Experiments
Nguyen & Miller (1992) — exchange algorithms
- Use
historical terminology and practical exchange design.
- Paper
A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete D-optimal designs
Huan, Jagalur & Marzouk (2024) — modern OED survey
- Use
current map of D, , E, Bayesian/nonlinear OED, computation.
- Paper
Optimal Experimental Design: Formulations and Computations
Quantization for estimation
Score-Function Quantization for Distributed Estimation
Venkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami · 2006
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Quantization for Maximin ARE in Distributed Estimation
Venkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami · 2007
optimizes the worst scalar asymptotic relative efficiency across parameter values using score-function threshold quantizers and an iterative design.
Optimal Scalar Quantization for Parameter Estimation
high-resolution asymptotics, optimal scalar point density, FI loss versus bit depth.
A Geometric Characterization of Fisher Information from Quantized Samples with Applications to Distributed Statistical Estimation
multivariate conditional-score geometry and trace-FI bounds under finite-bit quantization; special geometric optimality results.
A Fundamental Limitation on Maximum Parameter Dimension for Accurate Estimation With Quantized Data
Zhang, Blum, Kaplan, Lu · 2018
quantization-induced identifiability/FIM singularity limitations.
Lower Bounds for Learning Distributions under Communication Constraints via Fisher Information
carries the quantized-Fisher geometry into minimax lower bounds for interactive communication protocols.
On the Optimality of Sufficient Statistics-Based Quantizers
Dülek · 2023
for exponential families, an optimal deterministic K-level trace-FIM quantizer can be chosen with convex-polytopal cells in sufficient-statistic space.
Direct target localization in USNs with hybrid quantized multi-snapshot measurements: A geometric structure-aided approach
Jiang · 2026
Background reading in this tradition.
Determinant clustering and exchange
On Some Invariant Criteria for Grouping Data
classical affine-invariant determinant grouping criteria.
Clustering Methods Based on Likelihood Ratio Criteria
likelihood/determinant clustering under multivariate models.
Computational experiences with the exchange method: Applied to four commonly used partitioning cluster analysis criteria
Späth · 1977
single-point exchange for classical partition criteria including determinant-type criteria.
Cluster Dissection and Analysis: Theory, FORTRAN Programs, Examples
Späth · 1985
determinant exchange routines and matrix/scatter update machinery in executable form.
Some computational issues in cluster analysis with no a priori metric
Coleman · 1999
computational study of determinant-style clustering and first-improvement versus steepest-ascent moves.
Context for this tradition
Marriott
Classical determinant-based clustering criteria; useful historical terminology and objective comparison.
Vector quantization and Voronoi theory
On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity
Fisher · 1958
the classical anchors for DS8 (scalar efficient-score DP) and the leg of DS15's Proposition 4; the DS15 audit verified contiguity against full partition lattices, including duplicate values and unequal weights.
Asymptotically Optimal Block Quantization
Gersho · 1979
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Strong Consistency of K-Means Clustering
Pollard · 1981
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Multidimensional Asymptotic Quantization Theory with rth Power Distortion Measures
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Asymptotic Quantization Error of Continuous Signals and the Quantization Dimension
Zador · 1982
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Complexity of some parametric integer and network programming problems
Carstensen · 1983
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Uniqueness of locally optimal quantizer for log-concave density and convex error weighting function
Kieffer · 1983
DS15's assumption (S) — uniqueness of the optimal efficient-score interval quantizer — holds for Gaussian efficient scores by any of these; with Pollard (1981) this makes the population→empirical transfer of the scalar optimum fully rigorous in one dimension.
Applying Parallel Computation Algorithms in the Design of Serial Algorithms
Megiddo · 1983
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Global convergence and empirical consistency of the generalized Lloyd algorithm
closest structural precedent for the DS14 bridge shape — set convergence of empirical fixed-point (locally certified, not globally optimal) quantizers to the population fixed-point set, for convex additive distortions.
Principal points
Flury · 1990
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Weak limit theorems for univariate k-mean clustering under a nonregular condition
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Maximizing Non-Linear Concave Functions in Fixed Dimension
Toledo · 1993
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Principal points and self-consistent points of elliptical distributions
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Self-consistency: a fundamental concept in statistics
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms
Du, Faber, Gunzburger · 1999
CVT theory, Lloyd algorithm, geometric quantization.
Robustness Properties of k Means and Trimmed k Means
Garcia, Escudero, Gordaliza · 1999
the published record of the finite-sample singleton phenomenon at exact optima — the qualitative shape of the evidence (N-DS-BRIDGE-TREND). Hennig also supplies the normative point that one-point clusters are a modeling choice, not an invalidity.
Foundations of Quantization for Probability Distributions
nearest published instance of a uniform LLN over Voronoi-type partition classes (DS14 Step 3 companion to C1) and of existence/stationarity machinery for population quantizers. Thm 4.1/4.2 (secondary-verified via Levrard and Liu–Pagès): every cell of an optimal quantizer carries positive mass with null overlaps — the population (M2) analogue on the distortion side, and the deletion-vs- mechanism reused in DS15's rigidity lemma. Thm 5.1: scalar log-concave uniqueness (the book anchor for DS15's assumption (S)).
High-Rate Vector Quantization for Detection
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Breakdown points for maximum likelihood estimators of location-scale mixtures
Hennig · 2004
the published record of the finite-sample singleton phenomenon at exact optima — the qualitative shape of the evidence (N-DS-BRIDGE-TREND). Hennig also supplies the normative point that one-point clusters are a modeling choice, not an invalidity.
Unique optimal partitions of distributions and connections to hazard rates and stochastic ordering
DS15's assumption (S) — uniqueness of the optimal efficient-score interval quantizer — holds for Gaussian efficient scores by any of these; with Pollard (1981) this makes the population→empirical transfer of the scalar optimum fully rigorous in one dimension.
Stability of K-Means Clustering
Rakhlin, Caponnetto · 2006
direct prior art for the compact-codebook rigidity and uniform-law core of DS16.1. What does not transfer: their feasible objects are nearest-center codebooks, whereas DS16 starts from arbitrary sample groupings; they also do not handle unbounded finite-second-moment sources, signed nuisance moments, profiled Fisher information, or a nuisance-margin price.
Hartigan's Method: k-means Clustering without Voronoi
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Ckmeans.1d.dp: Optimal k-means Clustering in One Dimension by Dynamic Programming
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Nonasymptotic bounds for vector quantization in Hilbert spaces
Levrard · 2015
conceptual template for the DS14 slab-margin assumption (M4) and for a future fast-rate refinement of the bridge. Levrard's (mass) and (separation) are the published codification of what (M2)/(M5) buy; their positivity at population optima is inherited from Graf–Luschgy, never assumed of empirical optima.
Mahalanobis centroidal Voronoi tessellations
adjacent common/anisotropic metric Voronoi geometry.
Fast Exact k-Means, k-Medians and Bregman Divergence Clustering in 1D
Grønlund · 2017
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Parametric Shortest Paths in Planar Graphs
Gajjar, Radhakrishnan · 2019
forces any polynomial exact algorithm for the tilted ScoreQuant dual to prove structure specific to the interval-segmentation DAG and its quadratic segment costs.
Convergence rate of optimal quantization and application to the clustering performance of the empirical measure
DS15's assumption (S) — uniqueness of the optimal efficient-score interval quantizer — holds for Gaussian efficient scores by any of these; with Pollard (1981) this makes the population→empirical transfer of the scalar optimum fully rigorous in one dimension.
Consistency and inconsistency in k-means clustering
Blanchard, Jaffe, Zhivotovskiy · 2025
the closest published structure to DS15's Proposition 6 — constraints imposed at asymptotically negligible cost — and the reference to engage before any publication of the steering construction.
Context for this tradition
Set-valued M-estimation / epi-convergence templates
- Use
abstract shell for "empirical optimizer set converges to population optimizer set" that is agnostic to additivity and metric structure; the right vocabulary for the exchange-stable solution set.
- Does not transfer
supplies no concrete entropy or margin estimates for partition classes — those come from C1/Graf–Luschgy-style VC arguments.
- Sources
van der Vaart & Wellner (1996, Thm. 3.2.2 argmax theorem); Rockafellar & Wets, Variational Analysis (1998, Ch. 7 epi-convergence: inf-value convergence + cluster points of minimizers are minimizers); Royset & Wets (2020, Ann. Statist. 48:2759–2790, constrained M-estimators with set-valued minimizers); Molchanov, Theory of Random Sets (2005/2017, argmin sets as random closed sets).
Determinant-criterion consistency — confirmed search gap (28 Aug 2026)
Targeted triangulation found no published consistency theory, at any rate, for D- or -type (determinant/Schur) partition criteria estimated from i.i.d. samples — neither in the sequential/asymptotic optimal-design literature (fixed or regression-design point sets, not sampled partitions) nor in determinant clustering (Friedman–Rubin line: algorithms only). DS14 appears to be the first such bridge; recorded as a search gap, not a novelty claim.
Du, Emelianenko & Ju (2006)
- Use
convergence methods and assumptions for Lloyd/CVT.
- Paper
Convergence of the Lloyd Algorithm for Computing Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations
Bregman Voronoi / quantization literature
- Use
generalized centroid/dual-space geometry and local distortion approximations.
- Caution
ScoreQuant D objective is global/nonadditive, so Bregman/CVT results do not transfer automatically.
Inference-aware summaries in particle physics
INFERNO: Inference-Aware Neural Optimisation
practical adjacent categorization method; not exact hard D partition theory.
Optimising HEP parameter fits via Monte Carlo weight derivative regression
Valassi · 2020
defines the event-by-event sensitivity — the single-parameter score — shows the binned-fit information is with the cell-mean sensitivity, and argues the optimal partitioning variable is itself. Defines FIP and factors it as FIPFIPFIP (efficiency signal sharpness background sharpness).
Development of systematic uncertainty-aware neural network trainings for binned-likelihood analyses at the LHC
CMS Collaboration · 2025
is the inverse Schur complement, so the SANNT objective is the profiled criterion of DS-SCHUR with — the production-scale realisation of the theme, arrived at independently.
Context for this tradition
Brehmer, Louppe, Pavez & Cranmer (2020)
- Use
score oracle / local sufficient representation.
- Ideas
local score estimation, SALLY/SALLINO, simulation-based inference.
- Paper
Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference
Matchev & Shyamsundar (2021) — ThickBrick
- Use
highly relevant HEP categorization prior art.
- Idea
event category optimization with inference-aware criteria and Lloyd-like structure.
- Paper
Optimal event selection and categorization in high energy physics. Part I. Signal discovery
Erdmann, Kasaraguppe & Mausolf (2026) — Learning to bin
- Use
modern software/algorithm comparison for category learning.
- Idea
direct learned multidimensional categories via differentiable/Bayesian methods.
- Paper
Learning to bin
Software landscape
Context for this tradition
Historical determinant partitioning
- Späth FORTRAN code: direct historical example of determinant exchange and matrix-update implementation.
Optimal design packages — adjacent
Useful for algorithms/terminology, not direct hard score quantization:
- PyOptEx
- PyDOE optimal-design functionality
- optdesign
- BoFire / DoE ecosystems
- OApackage
HEP/inference-aware toolkits — adjacent
- MadMiner: score/likelihood-ratio estimation and local optimal observables.
- INFERNO implementations: differentiable inference-aware summaries.
- ThickBrick-related categorization code where available.
- Learning-to-bin / modern differentiable category optimizers.
General binning packages
- OptBinning and related supervised binning packages solve different objectives (predictive/monotonic/statistical binning), useful only as engineering/interface references.
Current software gap
No public package was identified whose central abstraction is:
multivariate hard score-space quantization with D and objectives, exact information accounting, direct-score / density-ratio / calibrated-classifier interfaces, deployable partitions, and theorem-aware optimality diagnostics. This is a search gap, not a proof of uniqueness.
Score compression and ratio estimation
Convex Optimization
Boyd, Vandenberghe · 2004
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Fast learning rates for plug-in classifiers
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Reliability, sufficiency, and the decomposition of proper scores
Brocker · 2009
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Nuisance Hardened Data Compression for Fast Likelihood-Free Inference
projects the score into a locally/asymptotically Fisher-preserving summary for parameters of interest using the nuisance Schur geometry.
Context for this tradition
Heavens, Jimenez & Lahav (2000) — MOPED
- Result
continuous linear compression to one summary per parameter preserving Fisher information under the paper's assumptions.
- Use
important ancestor for the “unbinned score/continuous compression is the information reference” viewpoint; not a finite hard quantizer.
- Paper
Massive Lossless Data Compression and Multiple Parameter Estimation from Galaxy Spectra
Alsing & Wandelt (2018) — generalized score compression
- Result
likelihood-score compression gives locally Fisher-optimal continuous summaries under broad regularity conditions.
- Use
direct conceptual bridge from full observations to the score-space representation before finite quantization.
- Paper
Generalized Massive Optimal Data Compression
Brehmer et al. — SALLY/SALLINO and MadMiner
- Use
learned likelihood-score representations and practical score-space histograms in HEP. Establishes that learned scores and score histograms are prior art; ScoreQuant's question is how to optimize the hard cells under D/.
Wunsch et al. (2021)
- Use
close HEP comparator for differentiable binned likelihood optimization with nuisances.
- Paper
Optimal Statistical Inference in the Presence of Systematic Uncertainties Using Neural Network Optimization Based on Binned Poisson Likelihoods with Nuisance Parameters
Simpson & Heinrich (2022/23) — neos
- Use
differentiable end-to-end expected-sensitivity optimization; adjacent software baseline, not score-Fisher hard partition theory.
- Paper
neos: End-to-End-Optimised Summary Statistics for High Energy Physics
Plug-in asymptotics
A note on the distribution of the correlation ratio
Wishart · 1932
normal-theory exact distribution of the sample correlation ratio (between-group over total centred sum of squares).
Mathematical Methods of Statistics
Cramér · 1946
Chapter 28, functions of sample moments: a smooth function of sample moments is asymptotically normal with variance from the first-order expansion, under the moment conditions that make the underlying sample moments asymptotically normal.
The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2: Inference and Relationship
§26.21–26.22 define the population correlation ratio (26.40), (26.47) and the sample version (26.48) with (26.49); §26.23–26.24 give the decomposition (26.50)–(26.51) and the normal-theory tests (26.52)–(26.55) for , and linearity, attributed to Fisher, via Cochran's theorem with the arrays fixed. No large-sample variance of the correlation ratio and no moment-based non-normal form are given.
Asymptotic expansions of the non-null distributions of the likelihood ratio criteria for multivariate linear hypothesis and independence
the non-null distribution of the LR (determinant-ratio) criterion for the multivariate linear hypothesis, expanded to order under a fixed alternative with no rank assumption on the noncentrality matrix; normal theory.
On the validity of the formal Edgeworth expansion
Bhattacharya, Ghosh · 1978
the formal Edgeworth expansion of is valid for smooth of a sample-mean vector under moment and Cramér-type conditions; the class covers all smooth functions of sample moments.
Some symmetric, invariant measures of multivariate association
Cramér, Nicewander · 1979
the symmetric, linearly invariant measures of association between two sets of variables are all functions of the canonical correlations, generalize , and are strictly ordered for any two sets.
The large sample variance of an intraclass correlation
delta-method variance of the ANOVA intraclass-correlation estimator under the one-way random-effects model.
Asymptotic distributions in canonical correlation analysis and other multivariate procedures for nonnormal populations
for populations with finite fourth moments, the sample canonical correlations and their test statistics are asymptotically normal with a covariance involving fourth-order cumulants; elliptical simplification and a corrected chi-squared test for zero coefficients.
Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics
Serfling · 1980
Chapter 3 (transformations of given statistics), Section 3.3 Theorem B: the multivariate delta method for functions of asymptotically normal vectors.
Influence functions for certain parameters in multivariate analysis
Radhakrishnan, Kshirsagar · 1981
closed-form Hampel influence functions for the generalized variance, the regression-coefficient matrix, the MANOVA noncentrality matrix and its eigenvalues, canonical correlations, principal components and the parameters behind Pillai's statistic, Hotelling's and Wilks' ; , and Mahalanobis as special cases.
Asymptotic distributions of functions of the eigenvalues of some random matrices for nonnormal populations
Fang, Krishnaiah · 1982
limit laws of smooth functions of the eigenvalues of the standard covariance/MANOVA/canonical-correlation random matrices under nonnormal sampling (fourth-cumulant covariance).
Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions
Hampel, Ronchetti, Rousseeuw, Stahel · 1986
for a statistical functional at , the asymptotic variance is .
The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion
Hall · 1992
Edgeworth expansions for the smooth function model; the studentized statistic's skewness term differs in sign and size from the non-studentized one, the standard explanation of small- under-coverage of plug-in Wald intervals.
Influence in canonical correlation analysis
Romanazzi · 1992
perturbation theory of the generalized eigenproblem yields the influence function of each squared canonical correlation and canonical vector pair; three sample versions; the squared multiple correlation and correspondence-analysis eigenvalues as special cases.
The effects of nonnormality on tests for dimensionality in canonical correlation and MANOVA models
null distributions of the dimensionality (rank) tests in CCA and MANOVA under nonnormal populations.
Asymptotic Statistics
van der Vaart · 1998
Theorem 3.1 (delta method): if and is differentiable at , then . Chapter 3 works the sample variance under ; Chapter 5 (Theorem 5.23) gives the M-estimator sandwich and the plug-in variance principle.
Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics
Part Three, Chapter 8 "Some important differentials": §8.3 "The differential of a determinant" (p. 149, ), §8.4 "The differential of an inverse" (p. 151); Chapter 9 §9.10 "Scalar functions of a matrix, II: determinant" (p. 178).
Tests of rank
rank tests from the smallest estimated characteristic roots of a -consistent, asymptotically normal matrix estimate; under rank the -scaled smallest roots converge to a weighted sum of independent variables.
An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Anderson · 2003
§7.5 "The generalized variance"; §8.3–8.5 likelihood-ratio criterion for linear hypotheses, its distribution and asymptotic expansion; §8.9 "Multivariate analysis of variance"; §12.2–12.4 canonical correlations, estimation and inference; §13.5–13.6 asymptotic distributions of roots (one and two Wishart matrices). Normal theory throughout these sections.
Influence functions and efficiencies of the canonical correlation and canonical vectors estimates
Taskinen, Croux, Kankainen, Ollila, Oja · 2006
influence functions of canonical correlations and vectors for general scatter-matrix functionals; for the sample covariance the squared correlation has in the canonical variates .
Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: theory, application, and implementation
Kelley · 2007
noncentral-// confidence intervals for , and Cohen's under normal-theory ANOVA (MBESS).
Other sources
Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models
Bickel, Klaassen, Ritov, Wellner · 1993
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Association of Random Variables, with Applications
Esary, Proschan, Walkup · 1967
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Principal Curves
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
A complement to the Chebyshev integral inequality
Jakubowski · 2021
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Extremal Characterizations of the Schur Complement and Resulting Inequalities
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Self-consistency and a generalized principal subspace theorem
Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.
Prior-art search records
These records cover the atlas independently of the home page’s selected results. A search gap records what was checked, not a priority claim.
Publication-grade audit of the DS15 margins dichotomy
— 10 queries, ≈95 results screened / 25 relevant. Retrieved full texts: Pollard 1981 (Yale scan), Liu–Pagès 2020 (JMLR), Roychowdhury arXiv:1703.06518, Mease–Nair 2006. Blocked: Graf–Luschgy book (403/500 on all open copies).
— 3 queries, ≈30/9. Retrieved: Levrard AOS 2015 full text.
— 5 queries, ≈45/15. Retrieved: St. John–Draper 1975 (CMU scan). Blocked: Silvey 1978 (JSTOR), Pukelsheim chapters.
— 13 queries, ≈120/15. Retrieved: Erdmann et al. arXiv:2601.07756 (HTML).
— 3 queries, ≈30/12. Retrieved: W. D. Fisher 1958 (Brown scan, pp. 789–792).
— 3 queries, ≈30/10. Retrieved: arXiv:2507.06226 abstract.
Publication-grade audit of the DS18 exact off-(L) basin and empirical transfer
Publication-grade audit of the DS19 tilt-DP certificate complex
Publication-grade audit of DS17 stable basins
Flury (1990); Tarpey & Flury (1996); Esary, Proschan & Walkup (1967); Jakubowski (2021); Serinko & Babu (1992, already held as a primary-text review in the workspace and checked against the publisher record).
Bickel, Klaassen, Ritov & Wellner (1993), against the authors' bibliographic record, the existing DS population-bridge audit, and independent semiparametric sources using the same projection definition.
Tarpey, Li & Flury (1995). Tarpey & Flury (1996) explicitly identifies its own Theorem 4.1 as the generalization of the 1995 finite-distinct-support result; later papers restate the 1995 Theorem 4.1 verbatim for principal points.
Tarpey & Loperfido (2015), the missed forward source.
Publication-grade audit of DS16 stable margins and the compile verdict
Independent audit of the frozen-rule vector retention plug-in CLT (O7)
Delta method, matrix differentials, canonical-correlation influence functions (Romanazzi's per-coefficient form now RESTATED through Taskinen et al. 2006 / Sinha et al. 2017), fourth-moment asymptotic normality of eigenvalue functionals (Muirhead & Waternaux ABSTRACT; Fang & Krishnaiah citation).
No located source states the uncentred fixed-partition determinant ratio on the library's cell moments with , its explicit , the plug-in variance, the ellipsoid characterisation of with the atomless witness, or the rate with its determinant/Schur limit. The rank-test literature (Robin & Smith 2000) has the same shape of limit for the smallest roots; the determinant form and the bias reading are O7's.
Nothing in O7 is claimed as novelty; nothing found requires re-attributing a project-level statement to a published theorem.
The researcher's LITERATURE/gaps.md entry stands: Radhakrishnan & Kshirsagar (1981) is still unread and unrestated (no accessible restatement found on 6 Sep either); Fang & Krishnaiah (1982) and Seo, Kanda & Fujikoshi (1995) remain citation-level. New keys: Robin-Smith-2000, Taskinen-Croux-Kankainen-Ollila-Oja-2006.
Independent audit of the frozen-rule scalar retention plug-in CLT (O6)
Chapter 3 "Delta Method", §3.1 "Basic Result" (p. 25) — primary text (scanned contents, ETH library). "3.1 Theorem" is the delta method with the exact hypotheses O6 uses (map defined on a subset of , differentiable at , with values in the domain) — primary text in the author's lecture notes with identical numbering (Kleijn/UvA host), the 1998 book itself corroborated (secondary). The sample variance under is Example 3.2, not an unnumbered example — primary text. Chapter 20 "Functional Delta Method" (§20.1 von Mises calculus, §20.2 Hadamard differentiability) — primary text (contents). Theorem 5.23 (M-estimator asymptotic normality) sits in §5.3 "Asymptotic Normality" (pp. 51–60) — section primary text, number secondary. Corrected: Example 3.2 named; Chapter 20 added.
Chapter 28 "Asymptotic properties of sampling distributions" (p. 363), §28.4 "Functions of moments" — primary text (archive.org scan of the contents). Companion finite-sample algebra: §27.4 "The variance", §27.7 "Functions of moments". Confirmed; the "cited from memory" caveat is lifted.
Chapter 3 "Transformations of Given Statistics" (p. 117), Chapter 2 "The Basic Sample Statistics" (p. 55) — primary record (Google Books). The labels "Theorem A" / "Theorem B" in §3.3, and which of the two needs only differentiability at the point — unresolved (no readable text reachable: Wiley and the e-book front matter refuse, the archive copy has no OCR). The researcher's "Thm B corroborated by two secondary citations" stands as secondary; the auditor adds no confirmation. Hampel-Ronchetti-Rousseeuw-Stahel-1986.** Chapter 2 "One-Dimensional Estimators" begins p. 78 — primary record; is cited to p. 85, inside §2.1 — secondary. Sub-section letter and equation numbers — unresolved.
Biometrika 24(3/4):441–456 — primary record (journal TOC). Normal-theory content — secondary. Chapter 26 "Statistical Relationship: Linear Regression and Correlation", Chapter 27 "Partial and Multiple Correlation" — primary text (front matter of the archive scan). The section treating the correlation ratio's standard error, and whether a non-normal moment-based variance is given — unresolved (body text not retrievable). Not registered; the gap stays in gaps.md.
Finite D exchange stability implies strict self-consistent Voronoi
approximate-design determinant maximization and pointwise sensitivity over a convexified design-measure feasible set; no partition-induced centroids or label-removal update.
scalar score-function quantization and Fisher-information distortion; no multivariate full-D finite exchange result.
conditional-score representation and multivariate trace-Fisher geometry; no determinant objective or hard-label relocation theorem.
trace-FIM optimal sufficient-statistic quantizers with polytopal cells for exponential families; not the finite full-D exchange implication.
determinant partition and exchange precedents. The accessible Späth DETEXM source explicitly computes and minimizes a determinant of pooled within-cluster scatter. That objective is not retained between-cell score Fisher information.
Margin price and value funnel at arbitrary finite Ds labelings
Margins dichotomy at global finite Ds optima (conditionally centered laws, scalar nuisance)
(quantization/-means): remote small cells are penalized. Graf–Luschgy Thm 4.1/4.2 (secondary): every cell of a population-optimal quantizer has positive mass — the deletion-vs- mechanism DS15's rigidity lemma reuses. Pollard 1981 (verbatim): empirical optima converge a.s. to the unique population optimum — the only classical template converting population margins into empirical-optima margins, and it needs uniqueness. Levrard 2015 (verbatim): , , and the boundary-mass margin condition codify what (M2)/(M5) buy; always hypotheses on the law, never proven automatic. Kieffer 1983 (secondary, twice independently): scalar log-concave uniqueness — Gaussian covered; Liu–Pagès 2020 Lemma 10/Prop 11 close the 1-D chain and give a positive-definite Hessian at the optimum.
(optimal design, D-subsampling): extreme support points are rewarded. Sibson–Kenny 1975 (abstract): D-optimal weights bounded above by ; no lower bound exists in print. Silvey 1978 (secondary): -optimal designs can carry singular full information — the design-side (M3) failure, handled there by generalized inverses. Wang–Yang–Stufken 2019 (verbatim): the D-determinant over an i.i.d. normal sample is maximized by extreme order statistics at per-point scale — the undiluted-mass premise of the extreme-cell heuristic.
(robust clustering): García-Escudero–Gordaliza 1999 (abstract), Hennig 2004 (secondary, verbatim restatement 2023): a single far-enough point earns a one-point cluster at the exact fixed- optimum — adversarial contamination, no i.i.d. rates.
Vector-parameter margins dichotomy beyond the scalar DS15 class
Best practical Ds solver with theorem-backed certificate
Frozen-rule scalar retention: plug-in CLT with a consistent influence-function variance
Frozen-rule vector retention: plug-in CLT for the geometric-mean D-retention with a consistent influence-function variance
Ogasawara (2007), JMVA 98(9):1726–1750 (Edgeworth expansions of CCA estimators under nonnormality, including studentized forms and Rozeboom's between-set correlation — the second-order backdrop for O7's coverage table; secondary summary); Cléroux & Ducharme (1989), Comm. Statist. 18(4): 1441–1454 (vector correlation under elliptical laws; asymptotic distribution; abstract); Cai, Liang & Zhou (2015), arXiv:1309.0482 (Corollary 1: fixed- CLT for , Gaussian sampling; PDF held in papers/); van den Burg & Lewis (1988), Psychometrika 53(1):109–122; Hotelling (1936); Wilks (1932). Rejected: Liu, Bathke & Harrar (2011) (rank-based nonparametric ); Jolliffe & Lukudu (1993) (one-sample tests); Kshirsagar & Gupta (1990) (factors of , normal theory); Josse & Holmes (2016) (survey of association measures, no asymptotics).