Literature

Find the publication behind a result. Each entry says what the paper establishes, how this project uses it, and what it leaves unsettled.

View the publication timeline
Publication years of the cited literature, one lane per traditionOptimal experimental designKiefer, Wolfowitz (1960) The Equivalence of Two Extremum ProblemsWynn (1970) The Sequential Generation of D-Optimum Experimental DesignsWynn (1972) Results in the Theory and Construction of D-Optimum Experimental DesignsSilvey, Titterington (1973) A Geometric Approach to Optimal Design TheoryWhittle (1973) Some General Points in the Theory of Optimal Experimental DesignKiefer (1974) General Equivalence Theory for Optimum Designs (Approximate Theory)Sibson, Kenny (1975) Coefficients in D-Optimal Experimental DesignSilvey (1978) Optimal design measures with singular information matricesSilvey, Titterington, Torsney (1978) An Algorithm for Optimal Designs on a Design SpaceNäther, Reinsch (1981) D_s-optimality and Whittle's equivalence theoremPukelsheim, Titterington (1983) General Differential and Lagrangian Theory for Optimal Experimental DesignWang, Yang, Stufken (2019) Information-Based Optimal Subdata Selection for Big Data Linear RegressionQuantization for estimationVenkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami (2006) Score-Function Quantization for Distributed EstimationVenkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami (2007) Quantization for Maximin ARE in Distributed EstimationFarias, Brossier (2014) Optimal Scalar Quantization for Parameter EstimationBarnes, Han, Özgür (2018) A Geometric Characterization of Fisher Information from Quantized Samples with Applications to Distributed Statistical EstimationZhang, Blum, Kaplan, Lu (2018) A Fundamental Limitation on Maximum Parameter Dimension for Accurate Estimation With Quantized DataBarnes, Han, Özgür (2020) Lower Bounds for Learning Distributions under Communication Constraints via Fisher InformationDülek (2023) On the Optimality of Sufficient Statistics-Based QuantizersJiang (2026) Direct target localization in USNs with hybrid quantized multi-snapshot measurements: A geometric structure-aided approachDeterminant clustering and exchangeFriedman, Rubin (1967) On Some Invariant Criteria for Grouping DataScott, Symons (1971) Clustering Methods Based on Likelihood Ratio CriteriaSpäth (1977) Computational experiences with the exchange method: Applied to four commonly used partitioning cluster analysis criteriaSpäth (1985) Cluster Dissection and Analysis: Theory, FORTRAN Programs, ExamplesColeman (1999) Some computational issues in cluster analysis with no a priori metricVector quantization and Voronoi theoryFisher (1958) On Grouping for Maximum HomogeneityGersho (1979) Asymptotically Optimal Block QuantizationPollard (1981) Strong Consistency of K-Means ClusteringBucklew, Wise (1982) Multidimensional Asymptotic Quantization Theory with rth Power Distortion MeasuresZador (1982) Asymptotic Quantization Error of Continuous Signals and the Quantization DimensionCarstensen (1983) Complexity of some parametric integer and network programming problemsKieffer (1983) Uniqueness of locally optimal quantizer for log-concave density and convex error weighting functionMegiddo (1983) Applying Parallel Computation Algorithms in the Design of Serial AlgorithmsSabin, Gray (1986) Global convergence and empirical consistency of the generalized Lloyd algorithmFlury (1990) Principal pointsSerinko, Babu (1992) Weak limit theorems for univariate k-mean clustering under a nonregular conditionToledo (1993) Maximizing Non-Linear Concave Functions in Fixed DimensionTarpey, Li, Flury (1995) Principal points and self-consistent points of elliptical distributionsTarpey, Flury (1996) Self-consistency: a fundamental concept in statisticsDu, Faber, Gunzburger (1999) Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and AlgorithmsGarcia, Escudero, Gordaliza (1999) Robustness Properties of k Means and Trimmed k MeansGraf, Luschgy (2000) Foundations of Quantization for Probability DistributionsGupta, Hero (2003) High-Rate Vector Quantization for DetectionHennig (2004) Breakdown points for maximum likelihood estimators of location-scale mixturesMease, Nair (2006) Unique optimal partitions of distributions and connections to hazard rates and stochastic orderingRakhlin, Caponnetto (2006) Stability of K-Means ClusteringTelgarsky, Vattani (2010) Hartigan's Method: k-means Clustering without VoronoiWang, Song (2011) Ckmeans.1d.dp: Optimal k-means Clustering in One Dimension by Dynamic ProgrammingLevrard (2015) Nonasymptotic bounds for vector quantization in Hilbert spacesRichter, Alexa (2015) Mahalanobis centroidal Voronoi tessellationsGrønlund (2017) Fast Exact k-Means, k-Medians and Bregman Divergence Clustering in 1DGajjar, Radhakrishnan (2019) Parametric Shortest Paths in Planar GraphsLiu, Pages (2020) Convergence rate of optimal quantization and application to the clustering performance of the empirical measureBlanchard, Jaffe, Zhivotovskiy (2025) Consistency and inconsistency in k-means clusteringInference-aware summaries in particle physicsde Castro, Dorigo (2019) INFERNO: Inference-Aware Neural OptimisationValassi (2020) Optimising HEP parameter fits via Monte Carlo weight derivative regressionCMS Collaboration (2025) Development of systematic uncertainty-aware neural network trainings for binned-likelihood analyses at the LHCScore compression and ratio estimationBoyd, Vandenberghe (2004) Convex OptimizationAudibert, Tsybakov (2007) Fast learning rates for plug-in classifiersBrocker (2009) Reliability, sufficiency, and the decomposition of proper scoresCranmer, Pavez, Louppe (2015) Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative ClassifiersAlsing, Wandelt (2019) Nuisance Hardened Data Compression for Fast Likelihood-Free InferencePlug-in asymptoticsWishart (1932) A note on the distribution of the correlation ratioCramér (1946) Mathematical Methods of StatisticsKendall, Stuart (1961) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2: Inference and RelationshipSugiura, Fujikoshi (1969) Asymptotic expansions of the non-null distributions of the likelihood ratio criteria for multivariate linear hypothesis and independenceBhattacharya, Ghosh (1978) On the validity of the formal Edgeworth expansionCramér, Nicewander (1979) Some symmetric, invariant measures of multivariate associationDonner, Koval (1980) The large sample variance of an intraclass correlationMuirhead, Waternaux (1980) Asymptotic distributions in canonical correlation analysis and other multivariate procedures for nonnormal populationsSerfling (1980) Approximation Theorems of Mathematical StatisticsRadhakrishnan, Kshirsagar (1981) Influence functions for certain parameters in multivariate analysisFang, Krishnaiah (1982) Asymptotic distributions of functions of the eigenvalues of some random matrices for nonnormal populationsHampel, Ronchetti, Rousseeuw, Stahel (1986) Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence FunctionsHall (1992) The Bootstrap and Edgeworth ExpansionRomanazzi (1992) Influence in canonical correlation analysisSeo, Kanda, Fujikoshi (1995) The effects of nonnormality on tests for dimensionality in canonical correlation and MANOVA modelsvan der Vaart (1998) Asymptotic StatisticsMagnus, Neudecker (1999) Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and EconometricsRobin, Smith (2000) Tests of rankAnderson (2003) An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical AnalysisTaskinen, Croux, Kankainen, Ollila, Oja (2006) Influence functions and efficiencies of the canonical correlation and canonical vectors estimatesKelley (2007) Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: theory, application, and implementationOther sourcesEsary, Proschan, Walkup (1967) Association of Random Variables, with ApplicationsHastie, Stuetzle (1989) Principal CurvesBickel, Klaassen, Ritov, Wellner (1993) Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric ModelsLi, Mathias (2000) Extremal Characterizations of the Schur Complement and Resulting InequalitiesTarpey, Loperfido (2015) Self-consistency and a generalized principal subspace theoremJakubowski (2021) A complement to the Chebyshev integral inequality194019501960197019801990200020102020

The strip places every dated source on one year axis, 1932 to 2026, in a lane per tradition: Optimal experimental design, 1960 to 2019, 12 sources; Quantization for estimation, 2006 to 2026, 8 sources; Determinant clustering and exchange, 1967 to 1999, 5 sources; Vector quantization and Voronoi theory, 1958 to 2025, 29 sources; Inference-aware summaries in particle physics, 2019 to 2025, 3 sources; Score compression and ratio estimation, 2004 to 2019, 5 sources; Plug-in asymptotics, 1932 to 2007, 21 sources; Other sources, 1967 to 2021, 6 sources.

Inference-aware summaries in particle physics
Each mark is one source, placed at its year of publication and coloured by the tradition whose lane it sits in.

Optimal experimental design

Coefficients in D-Optimal Experimental Design

Sibson, Kenny · 1975

prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (Wbμbμb⊤/WbW_b\mu_b\mu_b^\top/W_b-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.

Optimal design measures with singular information matrices

Silvey · 1978

prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (Wbμbμb⊤/WbW_b\mu_b\mu_b^\top/W_b-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.

Information-Based Optimal Subdata Selection for Big Data Linear Regression

Wang, Yang, Stufken · 2019

prior-art frame for DS15: determinant criteria reward extremes and tolerate singular information at optima, in contrast to distortion criteria (topic 4), which penalize both. The binning problem sits in the intersection: mass dilution (Wbμbμb⊤/WbW_b\mu_b\mu_b^\top/W_b-structure) restores the distortion side's (M2) while keeping the design side's (M3) failure.

Context for this tradition

Fedorov (1972) — optimal experiments and exchange

Use

exact/discrete design, exchange construction, rank-update thinking.

Book

Theory of Optimal Experiments

Pukelsheim — modern reference

Use

matrix criteria, efficiency, equivalence, geometric formulation.

Book

Optimal Design of Experiments

Nguyen & Miller (1992) — exchange algorithms

Use

historical terminology and practical exchange design.

Paper

A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete D-optimal designs

Huan, Jagalur & Marzouk (2024) — modern OED survey

Use

current map of D, DA/DsD_A/D_s, E, Bayesian/nonlinear OED, computation.

Paper

Optimal Experimental Design: Formulations and Computations


Quantization for estimation

Determinant clustering and exchange

Context for this tradition

Marriott

Classical determinant-based clustering criteria; useful historical terminology and objective comparison.

Vector quantization and Voronoi theory

On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity

Fisher · 1958

the classical anchors for DS8 (scalar efficient-score DP) and the btw≤v^K\mathrm{btw}\le\hat v_K leg of DS15's Proposition 4; the DS15 audit verified contiguity against full partition lattices, including duplicate values and unequal weights.

Principal points

Flury · 1990

Cited in the research record; follow the publication for its related results.

Foundations of Quantization for Probability Distributions

Graf, Luschgy · 2000

nearest published instance of a uniform LLN over Voronoi-type partition classes (DS14 Step 3 companion to C1) and of existence/stationarity machinery for population quantizers. Thm 4.1/4.2 (secondary-verified via Levrard and Liu–Pagès): every cell of an optimal quantizer carries positive mass with null overlaps — the population (M2) analogue on the distortion side, and the deletion-vs-WK−1W_{K-1} mechanism reused in DS15's rigidity lemma. Thm 5.1: scalar log-concave uniqueness (the book anchor for DS15's assumption (S)).

Stability of K-Means Clustering

Rakhlin, Caponnetto · 2006

direct prior art for the compact-codebook rigidity and uniform-law core of DS16.1. What does not transfer: their feasible objects are nearest-center codebooks, whereas DS16 starts from arbitrary sample groupings; they also do not handle unbounded finite-second-moment sources, signed nuisance moments, profiled Fisher information, or a nuisance-margin price.

Nonasymptotic bounds for vector quantization in Hilbert spaces

Levrard · 2015

conceptual template for the DS14 slab-margin assumption (M4) and for a future fast-rate refinement of the bridge. Levrard's pmin⁡p_{\min} (mass) and BB (separation) are the published codification of what (M2)/(M5) buy; their positivity at population optima is inherited from Graf–Luschgy, never assumed of empirical optima.

Context for this tradition

Set-valued M-estimation / epi-convergence templates

Use

abstract shell for "empirical optimizer set converges to population optimizer set" that is agnostic to additivity and metric structure; the right vocabulary for the exchange-stable solution set.

Does not transfer

supplies no concrete entropy or margin estimates for partition classes — those come from C1/Graf–Luschgy-style VC arguments.

Sources

van der Vaart & Wellner (1996, Thm. 3.2.2 argmax theorem); Rockafellar & Wets, Variational Analysis (1998, Ch. 7 epi-convergence: inf-value convergence + cluster points of minimizers are minimizers); Royset & Wets (2020, Ann. Statist. 48:2759–2790, constrained M-estimators with set-valued minimizers); Molchanov, Theory of Random Sets (2005/2017, argmin sets as random closed sets).

Determinant-criterion consistency — confirmed search gap (28 Aug 2026)

Targeted triangulation found no published consistency theory, at any rate, for D- or DsD_s-type (determinant/Schur) partition criteria estimated from i.i.d. samples — neither in the sequential/asymptotic optimal-design literature (fixed or regression-design point sets, not sampled partitions) nor in determinant clustering (Friedman–Rubin line: algorithms only). DS14 appears to be the first such bridge; recorded as a search gap, not a novelty claim.

Du, Emelianenko & Ju (2006)

Use

convergence methods and assumptions for Lloyd/CVT.

Paper

Convergence of the Lloyd Algorithm for Computing Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations

Bregman Voronoi / quantization literature

Use

generalized centroid/dual-space geometry and local distortion approximations.

Caution

ScoreQuant D objective is global/nonadditive, so Bregman/CVT results do not transfer automatically.


Inference-aware summaries in particle physics

Optimising HEP parameter fits via Monte Carlo weight derivative regression

Valassi · 2020

defines the event-by-event sensitivity γi=(1/wi) ∂wi/∂θ\gamma_i=(1/w_i)\,\partial w_i/\partial\theta — the single-parameter score — shows the binned-fit information is Iθ=∑kskϕk2I_\theta=\sum_k s_k\phi_k^2 with ϕk=⟨γ⟩k\phi_k=\langle\gamma\rangle_k the cell-mean sensitivity, and argues the optimal partitioning variable is γ\gamma itself. Defines FIP3=Iθ/Iθ(ideal)∈[0,1]_3=I_\theta/I_\theta^{(\rm ideal)}\in[0,1] and factors it as FIPefS×_{\rm efS}\timesFIPshS×_{\rm shS}\timesFIPshB_{\rm shB} (efficiency ×\times signal sharpness ×\times background sharpness).

Context for this tradition

Brehmer, Louppe, Pavez & Cranmer (2020)

Use

score oracle / local sufficient representation.

Ideas

local score estimation, SALLY/SALLINO, simulation-based inference.

Paper

Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference

Matchev & Shyamsundar (2021) — ThickBrick

Use

highly relevant HEP categorization prior art.

Idea

event category optimization with inference-aware criteria and Lloyd-like structure.

Paper

Optimal event selection and categorization in high energy physics. Part I. Signal discovery

Erdmann, Kasaraguppe & Mausolf (2026) — Learning to bin

Use

modern software/algorithm comparison for category learning.

Idea

direct learned multidimensional categories via differentiable/Bayesian methods.

Paper

Learning to bin


Score compression and ratio estimation

Context for this tradition

Heavens, Jimenez & Lahav (2000) — MOPED

Result

continuous linear compression to one summary per parameter preserving Fisher information under the paper's assumptions.

Use

important ancestor for the “unbinned score/continuous compression is the information reference” viewpoint; not a finite hard quantizer.

Paper

Massive Lossless Data Compression and Multiple Parameter Estimation from Galaxy Spectra

Alsing & Wandelt (2018) — generalized score compression

Result

likelihood-score compression gives locally Fisher-optimal continuous summaries under broad regularity conditions.

Use

direct conceptual bridge from full observations to the score-space representation before finite quantization.

Paper

Generalized Massive Optimal Data Compression

Brehmer et al. — SALLY/SALLINO and MadMiner

Use

learned likelihood-score representations and practical score-space histograms in HEP. Establishes that learned scores and score histograms are prior art; ScoreQuant's question is how to optimize the hard cells under D/DsD_s.

Wunsch et al. (2021)

Use

close HEP comparator for differentiable binned likelihood optimization with nuisances.

Paper

Optimal Statistical Inference in the Presence of Systematic Uncertainties Using Neural Network Optimization Based on Binned Poisson Likelihoods with Nuisance Parameters

Simpson & Heinrich (2022/23) — neos

Use

differentiable end-to-end expected-sensitivity optimization; adjacent software baseline, not score-Fisher hard partition theory.

Paper

neos: End-to-End-Optimised Summary Statistics for High Energy Physics

Plug-in asymptotics

Mathematical Methods of Statistics

Cramér · 1946

Chapter 28, functions of sample moments: a smooth function of sample moments is asymptotically normal with variance from the first-order expansion, under the moment conditions that make the underlying sample moments asymptotically normal.

The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2: Inference and Relationship

Kendall, Stuart · 1961

§26.21–26.22 define the population correlation ratio (26.40), (26.47) and the sample version (26.48) with 0≤r2≤e2≤10\le r^2\le e^2\le1 (26.49); §26.23–26.24 give the decomposition (26.50)–(26.51) and the normal-theory FF tests (26.52)–(26.55) for η2=0\eta^2=0, ρ=0\rho=0 and linearity, attributed to Fisher, via Cochran's theorem with the arrays fixed. No large-sample variance of the correlation ratio and no moment-based non-normal form are given.

Influence functions for certain parameters in multivariate analysis

Radhakrishnan, Kshirsagar · 1981

closed-form Hampel influence functions for the generalized variance, the regression-coefficient matrix, the MANOVA noncentrality matrix Σ−1δ\Sigma^{-1}\delta and its eigenvalues, canonical correlations, principal components and the parameters behind Pillai's statistic, Hotelling's T02T_0^2 and Wilks' Λ\Lambda; r2r^2, R2R^2 and Mahalanobis D2D^2 as special cases.

The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion

Hall · 1992

Edgeworth expansions for the smooth function model; the studentized statistic's skewness term differs in sign and size from the non-studentized one, the standard explanation of small-nn under-coverage of plug-in Wald intervals.

Influence in canonical correlation analysis

Romanazzi · 1992

perturbation theory of the generalized eigenproblem yields the influence function of each squared canonical correlation and canonical vector pair; three sample versions; the squared multiple correlation and correspondence-analysis eigenvalues as special cases.

Asymptotic Statistics

van der Vaart · 1998

Theorem 3.1 (delta method): if rn(Tn−θ)⇒Tr_n(T_n-\theta)\Rightarrow T and ϕ\phi is differentiable at θ\theta, then rn(ϕ(Tn)−ϕ(θ))⇒ϕθ′(T)r_n(\phi(T_n)-\phi(\theta))\Rightarrow\phi'_\theta(T). Chapter 3 works the sample variance under EX4<∞E X^4<\infty; Chapter 5 (Theorem 5.23) gives the M-estimator sandwich and the plug-in variance principle.

Tests of rank

Robin, Smith · 2000

rank tests from the smallest estimated characteristic roots of a n\sqrt n-consistent, asymptotically normal matrix estimate; under rank rr the nn-scaled smallest roots converge to a weighted sum of independent χ2\chi^2 variables.

An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Anderson · 2003

§7.5 "The generalized variance"; §8.3–8.5 likelihood-ratio criterion for linear hypotheses, its distribution and asymptotic expansion; §8.9 "Multivariate analysis of variance"; §12.2–12.4 canonical correlations, estimation and inference; §13.5–13.6 asymptotic distributions of roots (one and two Wishart matrices). Normal theory throughout these sections.

Other sources

Prior-art search records

These records cover the atlas independently of the home page’s selected results. A search gap records what was checked, not a priority claim.

Verification recordPublication-grade audit of the DS15 margins dichotomy

A. Quantizer consistency & uniqueness verification

— 10 queries, ≈95 results screened / 25 relevant. Retrieved full texts: Pollard 1981 (Yale scan), Liu–Pagès 2020 (JMLR), Roychowdhury arXiv:1703.06518, Mease–Nair 2006. Blocked: Graf–Luschgy book (403/500 on all open copies).

B. Margin conditions in quantization

— 3 queries, ≈30/9. Retrieved: Levrard AOS 2015 full text.

C. Singular information at \(D_s\)-optimal designs

— 5 queries, ≈45/15. Retrieved: St. John–Draper 1975 (CMU scan). Blocked: Silvey 1978 (JSTOR), Pukelsheim chapters.

D. The novelty axis (margins failure at optima of profiled criteria)

— 13 queries, ≈120/15. Retrieved: Erdmann et al. arXiv:2601.07756 (HTML).

E. 1-D contiguity

— 3 queries, ≈30/12. Retrieved: W. D. Fisher 1958 (Brown scan, pp. 789–792).

F. Swap-steering under side constraints

— 3 queries, ≈30/10. Retrieved: arXiv:2507.06226 abstract.

Verification recordPublication-grade audit of the DS18 exact off-(L) basin and empirical transfer

Verification recordPublication-grade audit of the DS19 tilt-DP certificate complex

Verification recordPublication-grade audit of DS17 stable basins

Read from primary full text

Flury (1990); Tarpey & Flury (1996); Esary, Proschan & Walkup (1967); Jakubowski (2021); Serinko & Babu (1992, already held as a primary-text review in the workspace and checked against the publisher record).

Classical monograph theorem cross-checked

Bickel, Klaassen, Ritov & Wellner (1993), against the authors' bibliographic record, the existing DS population-bridge audit, and independent semiparametric sources using the same projection definition.

Exact theorem scope cross-checked, primary proof inaccessible

Tarpey, Li & Flury (1995). Tarpey & Flury (1996) explicitly identifies its own Theorem 4.1 as the generalization of the 1995 finite-distinct-support result; later papers restate the 1995 Theorem 4.1 verbatim for principal points.

Abstract/theorem context screened, primary theorem inaccessible

Tarpey & Loperfido (2015), the missed forward source.

Verification recordPublication-grade audit of DS16 stable margins and the compile verdict

Verification recordIndependent audit of the frozen-rule vector retention plug-in CLT (O7)

Method: prior art, confirmed.

Delta method, matrix differentials, canonical-correlation influence functions (Romanazzi's per-coefficient form now RESTATED through Taskinen et al. 2006 / Sinha et al. 2017), fourth-moment asymptotic normality of eigenvalue functionals (Muirhead & Waternaux ABSTRACT; Fang & Krishnaiah citation).

Exact statement: search gap, not novelty.

No located source states the uncentred fixed-partition determinant ratio on the library's cell moments with 0/0:=00/0:=0, its explicit ψ\psi, the plug-in variance, the ellipsoid characterisation of σ2=0\sigma^2=0 with the atomless witness, or the n−(d−r)/dn^{-(d-r)/d} rate with its determinant/Schur limit. The rank-test literature (Robin & Smith 2000) has the same shape of limit for the smallest roots; the determinant form and the bias reading are O7's.

No re-attribution.

Nothing in O7 is claimed as novelty; nothing found requires re-attributing a project-level statement to a published theorem.

Bibliographic note.

The researcher's LITERATURE/gaps.md entry stands: Radhakrishnan & Kshirsagar (1981) is still unread and unrestated (no accessible restatement found on 6 Sep either); Fang & Krishnaiah (1982) and Seo, Kanda & Fujikoshi (1995) remain citation-level. New keys: Robin-Smith-2000, Taskinen-Croux-Kankainen-Ollila-Oja-2006.

Verification recordIndependent audit of the frozen-rule scalar retention plug-in CLT (O6)

van der Vaart (1998), `vanderVaart-1998`.

Chapter 3 "Delta Method", §3.1 "Basic Result" (p. 25) — primary text (scanned contents, ETH library). "3.1 Theorem" is the delta method with the exact hypotheses O6 uses (map defined on a subset of Rk\mathbb R^k, differentiable at θ\theta, TnT_n with values in the domain) — primary text in the author's lecture notes with identical numbering (Kleijn/UvA host), the 1998 book itself corroborated (secondary). The sample variance under EX4<∞EX^4<\infty is Example 3.2, not an unnumbered example — primary text. Chapter 20 "Functional Delta Method" (§20.1 von Mises calculus, §20.2 Hadamard differentiability) — primary text (contents). Theorem 5.23 (M-estimator asymptotic normality) sits in §5.3 "Asymptotic Normality" (pp. 51–60) — section primary text, number secondary. Corrected: Example 3.2 named; Chapter 20 added.

Cramér (1946), `Cramer-1946`.

Chapter 28 "Asymptotic properties of sampling distributions" (p. 363), §28.4 "Functions of moments" — primary text (archive.org scan of the contents). Companion finite-sample algebra: §27.4 "The variance", §27.7 "Functions of moments". Confirmed; the "cited from memory" caveat is lifted.

Serfling (1980), `Serfling-1980`.

Chapter 3 "Transformations of Given Statistics" (p. 117), Chapter 2 "The Basic Sample Statistics" (p. 55) — primary record (Google Books). The labels "Theorem A" / "Theorem B" in §3.3, and which of the two needs only differentiability at the point — unresolved (no readable text reachable: Wiley and the e-book front matter refuse, the archive copy has no OCR). The researcher's "Thm B corroborated by two secondary citations" stands as secondary; the auditor adds no confirmation. Hampel-Ronchetti-Rousseeuw-Stahel-1986.** Chapter 2 "One-Dimensional Estimators" begins p. 78 — primary record; V(T,F)=∫IF2dFV(T,F)=\int\mathrm{IF}^2dF is cited to p. 85, inside §2.1 — secondary. Sub-section letter and equation numbers — unresolved.

Wishart (1932), `Wishart-1932`.

Biometrika 24(3/4):441–456 — primary record (journal TOC). Normal-theory content — secondary. Chapter 26 "Statistical Relationship: Linear Regression and Correlation", Chapter 27 "Partial and Multiple Correlation" — primary text (front matter of the archive scan). The section treating the correlation ratio's standard error, and whether a non-normal moment-based variance is given — unresolved (body text not retrievable). Not registered; the gap stays in gaps.md.

Proved hereFinite D exchange stability implies strict self-consistent Voronoi

Kiefer–Wolfowitz

approximate-design determinant maximization and pointwise sensitivity over a convexified design-measure feasible set; no partition-induced centroids or label-removal update.

Venkitasubramaniam–Tong–Swami

scalar score-function quantization and Fisher-information distortion; no multivariate full-D finite exchange result.

Barnes–Han–Özgür

conditional-score representation and multivariate trace-Fisher geometry; no determinant objective or hard-label relocation theorem.

Dülek

trace-FIM optimal sufficient-statistic quantizers with polytopal cells for exponential families; not the finite full-D exchange implication.

Friedman–Rubin / Späth / Coleman et al.

determinant partition and exchange precedents. The accessible Späth DETEXM source explicitly computes and minimizes a determinant of pooled within-cluster scatter. That objective is not retained between-cell score Fisher information.

Proved here, no precedent foundMargin price and value funnel at arbitrary finite Ds labelings

Proved here, no precedent foundMargins dichotomy at global finite Ds optima (conditionally centered laws, scalar nuisance)

Distortion camp

(quantization/kk-means): remote small cells are penalized. Graf–Luschgy Thm 4.1/4.2 (secondary): every cell of a population-optimal quantizer has positive mass — the deletion-vs- WK−1W_{K-1} mechanism DS15's rigidity lemma reuses. Pollard 1981 (verbatim): empirical optima converge a.s. to the unique population optimum — the only classical template converting population margins into empirical-optima margins, and it needs uniqueness. Levrard 2015 (verbatim): pmin⁡p_{\min}, BB, and the boundary-mass margin condition codify what (M2)/(M5) buy; always hypotheses on the law, never proven automatic. Kieffer 1983 (secondary, twice independently): scalar log-concave uniqueness — Gaussian covered; Liu–Pagès 2020 Lemma 10/Prop 11 close the 1-D chain and give a positive-definite Hessian at the optimum.

Determinant camp

(optimal design, D-subsampling): extreme support points are rewarded. Sibson–Kenny 1975 (abstract): D-optimal weights bounded above by 1/k1/k; no lower bound exists in print. Silvey 1978 (secondary): DsD_s-optimal designs can carry singular full information — the design-side (M3) failure, handled there by generalized inverses. Wang–Yang–Stufken 2019 (verbatim): the D-determinant over an i.i.d. normal sample is maximized by extreme order statistics at per-point scale 2log⁡n2\log n — the undiluted-mass premise of the extreme-cell heuristic.

Singleton phenomenology

(robust clustering): García-Escudero–Gordaliza 1999 (abstract), Hennig 2004 (secondary, verbatim restatement 2023): a single far-enough point earns a one-point cluster at the exact fixed-KK optimum — adversarial contamination, no i.i.d. rates.

OpenVector-parameter margins dichotomy beyond the scalar DS15 class

Proved here, no precedent foundBest practical Ds solver with theorem-backed certificate

Derived from the literatureFrozen-rule scalar retention: plug-in CLT with a consistent influence-function variance

Derived from the literatureFrozen-rule vector retention: plug-in CLT for the geometric-mean D-retention with a consistent influence-function variance

Screened, adjacent, not transferring

Ogasawara (2007), JMVA 98(9):1726–1750 (Edgeworth expansions of CCA estimators under nonnormality, including studentized forms and Rozeboom's between-set correlation — the second-order backdrop for O7's coverage table; secondary summary); Cléroux & Ducharme (1989), Comm. Statist. 18(4): 1441–1454 (vector correlation under elliptical laws; asymptotic distribution; abstract); Cai, Liang & Zhou (2015), arXiv:1309.0482 (Corollary 1: fixed-pp CLT for log⁡det⁡Σ^\log\det\hat\Sigma, Gaussian sampling; PDF held in papers/); van den Burg & Lewis (1988), Psychometrika 53(1):109–122; Hotelling (1936); Wilks (1932). Rejected: Liu, Bathke & Harrar (2011) (rank-based nonparametric Λ\Lambda); Jolliffe & Lukudu (1993) (one-sample tests); Kshirsagar & Gupta (1990) (factors of Λ\Lambda, normal theory); Josse & Holmes (2016) (survey of association measures, no asymptotics).