Consistency and inconsistency in k-means clustering
Constraint-restored consistency of empirical clustering (30 Aug 2026)
- Use
the closest published structure to DS15's Proposition 6 — constraints imposed at asymptotically negligible cost — and the reference to engage before any publication of the steering construction.
- Does not transfer
their constraint repairs a moment pathology of the scalar-distortion objective; DS15's margin fights the profiled criterion's own drive to nuisance degeneracy, and no published theorem provides swap-steering to a side constraint at cost.
- Sources
Blanchard, Jaffe & Zhivotovskiy (arXiv:2507.06226, abstract): under only a finite first moment, empirical k-means centers can fail to converge even when the population optimum is unique — the failure mode is extreme cluster imbalance — and an a priori balance (minimum-size) constraint restores consistency. Kanungo et al. (2004, Comput. Geom. 28:89–112): single-swap local search with bounded worst-case cost. Bradley, Bennett & Demiriz (2000, MSR TR-2000-65): minimum-cluster-size constrained assignment via network flow.
Empirical k-means centers can fail to converge under finite first moment even with a unique population optimum (extreme cluster imbalance); consistency restored by an a priori balance constraint. Closest published structure to DS15 Proposition 6 (constraints at negligible asymptotic cost), but repairs a moment pathology rather than the optimizer-driven degeneracy DS15 proves; scalar distortion only. Engage before publication.
Cited by
Relevant to
Claims this source bears on without being cited in their proofs.