Uniqueness of locally optimal quantizer for log-concave density and convex error weighting function
Scalar quantizer uniqueness (log-concave laws)
- Use
DS15's assumption (S) — uniqueness of the optimal efficient-score interval quantizer — holds for Gaussian efficient scores by any of these; with Pollard (1981) this makes the population→empirical transfer of the scalar optimum fully rigorous in one dimension.
- Does not transfer
one-dimensional and distortion-side only; uniqueness for fails in general (rotational symmetry), which is exactly why DS15 is stated for .
- Sources
Kieffer (1983, IEEE IT 29:42–47): log-concave density + convex, strictly increasing, error weight ⟹ the locally optimal -level scalar quantizer is unique, hence globally optimal, and Lloyd iterations converge to it (secondary-verified via Kazıklı–Sarıtaş–Gezici–Linder–Yüksel, arXiv:2012.08265, Thm 3, and Liu & Pagès, JMLR 21(86), Lemma 10). Fleischer (1964, IEEE Conv. Rec. 12:104–111, verbatim): strict log-concavity ⟹ unique stationary point of the -level MSE quantizer; Gaussian, Laplacian, Rayleigh covered explicitly. Trushkin (1982, IEEE IT 28:187–198): convex error weights (hypotheses unverified, cited by Liu–Pagès). Liu & Pagès Prop 11: strictly log-concave density ⟹ positive-definite distortion Hessian at the optimum — a published population-level conditioning statement at the scalar optimum. Mease & Nair (2006, Statistica Sinica 16:1299–1312, verbatim, 30 Aug 2026 audit): uniqueness under log-concavity of the density via likelihood-ratio ordering — and an explicit counterexample refuting Eubank (1988)'s weaker sufficient condition (log-concavity of ): a spliced exponential/Weibull density with three stationary solutions. Boundary for (S): the assumption must stay pinned to log-concavity of the density itself; Eubank-type weakenings are known-broken.
IEEE Trans. IT 29:42-47. Log-concave source + convex strictly increasing C1 error weight: unique locally optimal scalar quantizer (hence globally optimal); Gaussian covered. Secondary-verified via Kazikli et al. arXiv:2012.08265 Thm 3 and Liu-Pages-2020 Lemma 10.
Cited by
- Publication-grade audit of the DS15 margins dichotomyAUDIT-DS-MARGINS-AT-OPTIMA
- Publication-grade audit of the DS18 exact off-(L) basin and empirical transferAUDIT-DS-NONCENTERED-GLOBAL-BASIN-TRANSFER
- Exact off-class global basin transfers to empirical exchange-stable optimaDS-NONCENTERED-GLOBAL-BASIN-TRANSFER
- Margins dichotomy at global finite Ds optima (conditionally centered laws, scalar nuisance)OPEN-DS-MARGINS-AT-OPTIMA