Counterexample CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-TIE-MASK-001

What it falsifies

A deterministic tilt-DP implementation that reports an open bracket [Phi^+(z_DP), d] has exhibited a duality gap. FALSE: the bracket closes exactly (g^+ = d) but the DP-optimal set at the dual minimizer contains a non-closing labeling, which a deterministic tie policy can return.

CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-TIE-MASK-001: labels before, 3 atoms in 2 cells-2-1.5-1-0.5000-1-0.800-0.600-0.400-0.2000score 1score 2
Labels before
CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-TIE-MASK-001: labels after / optimum, 3 atoms in 2 cells-2-1.5-1-0.5000-1-0.800-0.600-0.400-0.2000score 1score 2
Labels after / optimum
  • Cell 0
  • Cell 1
Atoms of CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-TIE-MASK-001
AtomWeightScore 1Score 2Cell beforeCell after
11/3-1-100
21/30-211
31/30001

Objective

The criterion value at each labelling, exactly as the fixture certifies it.

LabellingObjective
Labels before4/27
Labels after2/9

How it was verified

Method: exhaustive.

The tilted values at beta* are pairwise distinct, so this is a DP value tie, not a tilted-value tie: two contiguous labelings attain v_K(beta*) with different derivatives, and only the zero-derivative one satisfies the normal equation.

Claims that cite it

Recorded 2 September 2026. The fixture as JSON.