Counterexample CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-GAP-002

What it falsifies

The scalar-POI tilt-dual duality gap needs N>=4 (support minimality of CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-GAP-001 across all K). FALSE: at N=3, K=2 the exact dual minimum strictly exceeds the exact global profiled value, and N=3 is the smallest support at which any exact-K>=2 problem has more than one labeling.

CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-GAP-002: labels before, 3 atoms in 2 cells-1-0.800-0.600-0.400-0.2000-1-0.50000.5001score 1score 2
Labels before
CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-GAP-002: labels after / optimum, 3 atoms in 2 cells-1-0.800-0.600-0.400-0.2000-1-0.50000.5001score 1score 2
Labels after / optimum
  • Cell 0
  • Cell 1
Atoms of CE-DS-TILT-DUAL-GAP-002
AtomWeightScore 1Score 2Cell beforeCell after
11/3-1000
21/30-110
31/31011

Objective

The criterion value at each labelling, exactly as the fixture certifies it.

LabellingObjective
Labels before1/3
Labels after1/3

How it was verified

Method: exhaustive.

All arithmetic is fractions.Fraction. The dual minimum is exact (a rational tilt certified by the one-sided subgradient condition D-(beta*) <= 0 <= D+(beta*)); the rational convex-mixture certificate independently lower-bounds it.

Claims that cite it

Recorded 2 September 2026. The fixture as JSON.