Counterexample CE-D-LLOYD-001

What it falsifies

Reassigning all rows to their nearest centroid under the current I_q^{-1} Mahalanobis metric, then recomputing centroids, monotonically increases log det I_q.

CE-D-LLOYD-001: labels before, 8 atoms in 3 cells-101-0.50000.50011.5score 1score 2
Labels before
CE-D-LLOYD-001: labels after / optimum, 8 atoms in 3 cells-101-0.50000.50011.5score 1score 2
Labels after / optimum
  • Cell 0
  • Cell 1
  • Cell 2
Atoms of CE-D-LLOYD-001
AtomWeightScore 1Score 2Cell beforeCell after
11/80.11160.442710
21/8-0.29320.653700
31/8-0.5995-1.268501
41/8-0.6848-1.545611
51/80.48100.952122
61/81.67070.937021
71/80.16891.709020
81/8-0.8548-1.880511

Objective

The criterion value at each labelling, exactly as the fixture certifies it.

LabellingObjective
Labels before-3.810643191735313
Labels after-3.9471643803321044

How it was verified

Method: exact_formula.

Scores are exact decimals (rationals). The batch adaptive-Mahalanobis Lloyd step (nearest centroid under the exact inverse of the current binned information, argmin decided in Fraction arithmetic) produces labels_after_or_optimum, and the exact determinant strictly decreases: det_before > det_after. logdet drop ~ 0.136521 nat. Regression: tests/test_research_claims.py::test_adaptive_mahalanobis_lloyd_step_can_decrease_d_objective.

Claims that cite it

Recorded 28 August 2026. The fixture as JSON.