Result · TRACE-WHITENED-KMEANS
Trace retention is whitened k-means
Derived from the literaturepublication: derived from published
Meaning
Maximizing normalized trace is equivalent to minimizing within-cell scatter in Fisher-whitened score space.
Scientific context
Once the score coordinates are put into Fisher-whitened units, maximizing the retained trace is exactly weighted k-means — the same objective, the same optimum, the same algorithm. This explains why running k-means on whitened scores is a principled answer, and it pins down precisely which question that answer is answering.
This is a corollary of the information-loss decomposition (FI-LOSS-DECOMPOSITION) and is explicitly not presented as a theorem in its own right: that normalized trace after Fisher whitening is equivalent to weighted k-means was already established.
Statement
d-tr(I_full^{-1}I_q)=E||z-E[z|Z]||^2 for z=I_full^{-1/2}s; maximizing retained normalized trace is weighted k-means.
Where it stops
This control case is known in substance and is not a novelty claim.
Closest prior work
- Venkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami (2006)Score-Function Quantization for Distributed Estimation
- Venkitasubramaniam, Tong, Swami (2007)Quantization for Maximin ARE in Distributed Estimation
- Barnes, Han, Özgür (2018)A Geometric Characterization of Fisher Information from Quantized Samples with Applications to Distributed Statistical Estimation
- Dülek (2023)On the Optimality of Sufficient Statistics-Based Quantizers
Nearest prior work
Relationships
Rests on
Enables
Raises
Open next door
In the library
Carried by KMeansConfig, NormalizedTrace. Reference (opens in a new tab).
Local graph
Proof
T1. Fisher-whitened normalized trace equals weighted k-means
With
Therefore maximizing normalized retained trace is exactly squared-error vector quantization / weighted k-means in whitened score space.
This is useful as a baseline, not a headline novelty claim.